Video

dananot:

fuckyeahthebeatles:

Fascinating and imaginative.

Beautiful song and video. :)

Photo
robot-heart:

oil by *Lora8 on deviantART

Girl in pigtails.
Photo
ninyako:

tapaking:

9gag:

Awesome Pen Drawings

holy crap. that’s pen drawings?
more here.

ozzam.

ninyako:

tapaking:

9gag:

Awesome Pen Drawings

holy crap. that’s pen drawings?

more here.

ozzam.

Video

zombienovela:

Hermes Tokyo.

Now, this is more than just a windows display. My mind is blown!

Photo
robot-heart:

(via brittney t.)
Photo
kreamegatronkilledthedemonyehey:

unomagazine:

let the right one in
liquidnight:Ingar Krauss - Untitled - Hanna, Ediger-Eller, 2001

From Ingar Krauss Portraits

kreamegatronkilledthedemonyehey:

unomagazine:

let the right one in

liquidnight:Ingar Krauss - Untitled - Hanna, Ediger-Eller, 2001

From Ingar Krauss Portraits

Tags: movies art
Photo
(via smut-to-go)
Photo
(via sabino)

(via sabino)

Photo
isolophobia:

(via macaroononastick)
Photo
(via sweethomestyle)
Tags: art
Photo
unnerving:

painting by Glennray Tutor

unnerving:

painting by Glennray Tutor

Tags: art painting
Photo
colamonstrosity:

“You don’t consider yourself an artist? Give me a effin break!!!!”
I believe too many people use the term too loosely. It’s such a giant umbrella of a word and sounds too general, but definitions are personal afterall.
I still prefer specific and profession-related ones like illustrator, graphic designer, sculptor, actor, painter, writer, food photographer, tattoo artist, fashion designer, etc. Truth is, anyone can call him/herself an artist and I’m still making peace with how easily anyone can pick up such a title as if it is nothing sacred or credible anymore.
Am I an illustrator? No. Am I a photographer? No. Am I a graphic designer? Web designer? Actor? Painter? So far, I’m none of those officially.
As I realized that I’m neither purist nor care about anything’s sanctity, I still can’t put my finger on why exactly it leaves me feeling icky about the word artist and I’m not the only one with that kind of sentiment. Is it because I hear people talk so much about it more than actually making it? Is it because so many people have decided to pick up the image of one and put too much emphasis on the superficial (whether that is considered an artform is debatable)? Is it because of the bandwagon effect that draws in fanciful youngsters who have more romanticism than talent or dedication?
None of those agree with “less talk more walk.”
Point is, it depends on how people identify themselves and I don’t call myself one, at least not yet. It’s not because I have terrible self-esteem but because I’m honest enough to let everyone know that I still have a lot to learn, that I value the craft and appreciation, and that I am eager to submit myself to more experiences and more years of practice and, if the opportunity comes, schooling. For now, I have resolved to take it easy as a hobbyist; everyone has his or her own time. Also, I personally find that making a full-time carreer out of it may start killing the fun I have with getting creative - I choose to retain some structure and order, but that’s another topic.
I’m still thinking of how to articulate this better. God knows my opinion may change and I’ll never know for sure how soon.
What about you? What do you think makes an artist? Do you consider yourself one, and why or why not? I’d love to hear your thoughts.
I can call myself an art appreciator, that’s for sure.
(photo taken from Audrey Kawasaki’s blog)
Ask away:  http://formspring.me/colamonstrosity

colamonstrosity:

“You don’t consider yourself an artist? Give me a effin break!!!!”

I believe too many people use the term too loosely. It’s such a giant umbrella of a word and sounds too general, but definitions are personal afterall.

I still prefer specific and profession-related ones like illustrator, graphic designer, sculptor, actor, painter, writer, food photographer, tattoo artist, fashion designer, etc. Truth is, anyone can call him/herself an artist and I’m still making peace with how easily anyone can pick up such a title as if it is nothing sacred or credible anymore.

Am I an illustrator? No. Am I a photographer? No. Am I a graphic designer? Web designer? Actor? Painter? So far, I’m none of those officially.

As I realized that I’m neither purist nor care about anything’s sanctity, I still can’t put my finger on why exactly it leaves me feeling icky about the word artist and I’m not the only one with that kind of sentiment. Is it because I hear people talk so much about it more than actually making it? Is it because so many people have decided to pick up the image of one and put too much emphasis on the superficial (whether that is considered an artform is debatable)? Is it because of the bandwagon effect that draws in fanciful youngsters who have more romanticism than talent or dedication?

None of those agree with “less talk more walk.”

Point is, it depends on how people identify themselves and I don’t call myself one, at least not yet. It’s not because I have terrible self-esteem but because I’m honest enough to let everyone know that I still have a lot to learn, that I value the craft and appreciation, and that I am eager to submit myself to more experiences and more years of practice and, if the opportunity comes, schooling. For now, I have resolved to take it easy as a hobbyist; everyone has his or her own time. Also, I personally find that making a full-time carreer out of it may start killing the fun I have with getting creative - I choose to retain some structure and order, but that’s another topic.

I’m still thinking of how to articulate this better. God knows my opinion may change and I’ll never know for sure how soon.

What about you? What do you think makes an artist? Do you consider yourself one, and why or why not? I’d love to hear your thoughts.

I can call myself an art appreciator, that’s for sure.

(photo taken from Audrey Kawasaki’s blog)

Ask away: http://formspring.me/colamonstrosity

Tags: artist issues art
Photo
(via unicornology)
Photo
watermelonsorbet:

(via eidesis)
Tags: art drawing